░“Part of being sane, is being a little bit crazy.”
oneohseven.
The crazy class of M09107 <3
Mukesh - 2nd Dec
Benedix Sim - 17th May
Jaewoong - 16th Sep
Wei Xuan - 7th Feb
Kai Hern - 16th July
Shi Yi - 7th Mar
Jia Ying - 15th Jan
Gabriel - 6th Sep
Matthew - 29th Sep
Samuel - 17th July
Yaazhini - 2nd June
Yan Tong - 15th Nov
Jing Wei - 18th Jan
Chelsea - 5th Nov
Frederick -15th July
Yong Kuan - 17th Feb
Gideon - 15th Oct
Joel - 16th Jan
Masaki - 22nd Sep
Manish - 27th Apr
Fangyi - 15th Jun
*Tong lin - Transferred to Dunman High.
^wx here. Yeah I changed it. I'm bored. It took me 7 tries to get our password -.- I'm going off now. Bye.
Going, Going, Gone.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
I wonder how many of you are going to bookmark this page, and if we will continue to keep in touch next year. Weird concept really, separating classes. Can't seem to get my head around it. We've experienced it before. In Primary school, I changed classes every year. Didn't mind though, not in the least. I wonder why its so different this year. Maybe we've developed emotionally and all that crap, and we finally experienced real bonding. Or maybe its because most friendships are strengthened over a fastfood meal. Considering how many of those I've had this year, I would say our friendships have been strengthened infinitely.
Word has gotten round that the selection of our humanities subject will determine the classes we get into next year. Of course, that affects the subjects we choose. Unwilling to be separated from our friends, some of us have chosen subjects we are't interested in, for the sake of joining our friends. I do admit, I'm part of that group. The wisdom of such decisions, are, of course, questionable. Nevertheless, we are who we choose to be. -inaccurate quote The Ask and the Answer- Young as we are, we can't be trusted to make good decisions for ourselves. As such, I guess if we feel having our friends around would greatly increase our motviation to study (as it is in my case) making a choice of a humanity subject based on where our friends are going is justifiable.
Yes, I would think it IS human nature to be unwilling to part with all that is familiar. Year 3 is a promise of hardships, late nights spent burning midnight oil, and feverish speeding through homework during recess. Without the familiar faces around to guide us through, I wonder if we will really be able to cope. But our seniors have done it. And the seniors before them. They've risen spectacularly to the occasion, and made better friends than they had in Year 1. It is safe to say we'll make it through. But will we remember? The games, (no, this is NOT a pun to make you lose) the wars, the chasing, the playing, and even the (attempted) group studying that resulted in a goal post being carried across the soccer field. But no matter. This post, I hope, will serve to remind everyone of the joys we shared. Not the hardships, (did we even have any?!) but the joys of getting to know one another. (What a load of sentimental crap)
They say friends can become strangers, and no doubt, that will be the outcome of many among us. But I sincerely hope that we will remember one another, that we will still share an occasional lunch in the canteen or even maybe in the standard location for teens to dine. (I'm speaking, of course, of fastfood restaurants) May we find it in us to keep in touch and possibly, like in the case of my mum, meet up after 40 odd years for a gathering-- a time to reminisce the carefree life we led as Year 1s and 2s in NUS High.
Okay, that was really cheem english. No particular reason, I just felt like it. Anyways, good luck to all of you wherever you may go, and God bless. (uh. ok. how about, "keep in touch"? I'm not a religious person, really)
By the way, about 17 of us haven't completed out module evaluation surveys. Hands up, those who are going to do it outside of school time..... yup. None. School shouldn't let us do it on our free time. It kinda means we won't do it. Then again, its a good chance to flame the teachers. Unfortunately the survey isn't anonymous and as our kind, indignant teacher who teaches some of us on Fridays points out, teachers actually read those things. Good luck with your veiled insults. If you're good enough, you'd be able to say what you really feel without a summons from a teacher when school re-opens. If not, give up now and no disciplinary action will be taken against you.
HOW IS THIS FUNNY?
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Yeah, how is this funny because I can't stop laughing, even though it reminds me domestic abuse :(
Regret
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
wow this got a lot of flaming. Im such a whiner Awkward. Ok lets not talk about this anymore. Yeah Im wasting my time since I am like watching tv and reading my eng script at the same time - I think Im really pathetic (yes I know I am).
Watching really weird things on youtube.
College humour is funny. =3 is like...meh. Dont be offended it you saw what =3
NUS High Memories: Campus’ dark past
Monday, October 18, 2010
As with every school campus, there is some past to it. NUS High is no different despite it being a new campus. Much of the past originates back from the days when the plot of land that we are currently sitting on was Nan Hua High school. The following stuffs that will be mentioned are stuffs that I have heard over the years as well as information from some background research. That being said, it is up to the reader to believe the validity of this post for there is no way that I can verify everything.
The NUS High pond besides the lift used to be the site of the old DnT room of Nan Hua. Rumour has it that one day, a girl’s hair got entangled with a wood cutting machine. Unable to free herself, the blade came down and decapitated her. Ever since, her spirit has been haunting that area. Because of that, our school designed a pond in that area, believing that the water will trap her spirit and appease it. Also, because of the incident, all Nan Hua girls were required to tie up their hair in pigtails, thus starting the tradition of Nan Hua girls with pigtails.
The other NUS High pond behind the classroom block and near the road also has a similar reason for its existence. It was said that there used to exist a haunted toilet that was locked up and was generally avoided. However one day, some students got bored and decide to break the lock and enter the toilet. Upon entering the toilet, all of them let out a blood-curdling scream and ran out, faces pale as sheet. They said that they saw bloodstains everywhere, and that there was some ghostly apparition in the mirror. NUS High when building the school, decided to place a pond over the area as well so as to appease this spirit.
Finally, if anyone ever noticed, NUS High school hostel is built in the shape of a swastika and this is no coincidence. During WWII, the area used to be a swamp and was the site of a japanese massacre. Because of that, the “dark” energy that radiated from the place was very strong. As such, a swastika sign was to be placed over it to contain the “dark energy”. Also, as if this wasn’t sufficient, the pi-wall was designed to be more than a pi-wall. It was designed to be a large reflective mirror of sorts to reflect all these “dark energy” away from the main school campus.
Perhaps there are other stories of NUS High school campus waiting to be uncovered, but this is as far as I know. And with that I’d say that NUS High was built after much consultation with geomancers with regards to feng shui and stuffs.
Yes. In Emmett v. Kent School District, 92 F. Supp.2d 1088 (W.D. Wash. 2000), the court held that public school officials had violated a student's First Amendment rights by punishing the student for his personal website, the "Unofficial Kentlake High Home Page." The court held that "[a]lthough the intended audience was undoubtedly connected to Kentlake High School, the speech was entirely outside of the school's supervision or control." Likewise, in Flaherty v. Keystone Oaks School Dist., 247 F.Supp.2d 698 (W.D. Pa. 2003) a federal court found a public school's policy, which prohibited "inappropriate, harassing, offensive or abusive" behavior, was unconstitutional because "the policy could be (and is) read by school officials to cover speech that occurs off school premises and that is not related to any school activity in an arbitrary manner."
Sweet, my Personal Blog is Untouchable!
Not so fast. EFF believes that public schools have no right to punish or censor any speech activities conducted outside of the school gates, and the Supreme Court has yet to consider such off-campus censorship. However, some lower courts have applied the Tinker "material disruption" standard in cases concerning the personal web sites of high school and middle school students. For example, in Beussink v. Woodland School District, 30 F. Supp.2d 1175 (E.D. Mo. 1998), a federal court applied Tinker's "material disruption" standard when considering a student's web site that used vulgar language to criticize his public school and its teachers and administrators. Even though the site was created on the student's own time, with his own computer and Internet connection, the court decided that the Tinker "material disruption" test applied since a classmate viewed the site at school. While it is unfortunate that the court applied the less protective standard, in the end the student was vindicated — since there was no material disruption, the court decided that the student's First Amendment rights were violated.
Likewise, in J.S. ex rel H.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District, 569 A.2d 638 (Pa. 2002), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that despite the fact that the web site was not created at school, the Tinker test applied because the site "was aimed at a specific school and/or its personnel" and was "brought onto the school campus or accessed at school by its originator." The court proceeded to hold that the public school's punishment of a student for his off-campus web site, which included an image of a teacher's face morphing into Hitler's, an image of the same teacher with a decapitated head dripping with blood, and a request that visitors contribute $20 for a hit man, was justified under the "material disruption" standard.
Better reasoned cases have looked at whether the speech was "intentionally or knowingly communicate[d]" to the students before applying Tinker's "material disruption" test to speech that originated off campus. See e.g. Porter v. Ascension Parish School Bd., 393 F.3d 608 (5th Cir. 2004).
Again, EFF doesn't think that a public school should be able to punish you for the contents of your personal blog. Nevertheless, these cases show that some courts may find even a blog created and hosted off campus to be subject to school restrictions.
So Can I Criticize Teachers on My Blog?
It depends on how you do it. Merely criticizing or insulting schoolteachers and administrators, even with vulgar language, likely will not amount to the "material disruption" required by the Supreme Court. See e.g. Beidler v. North Thurston County (Wash.) Sch. Dist., No. 99-2-00236-6 (Thurston Cty. Super. Ct. July 18, 2000) (unpublished opinion holding the First Amendment protected a student's private web site that ridiculed a school administrator), andBeussink v. Woodland School District, 30 F. Supp.2d 1175 (E.D. Mo. 1998) (student's vulgar criticisms of school on his personal blog did not rise to a "material disruption.").
However, if you publish anything that might be considered a physical threat toward a student, teacher, or administrator, a court will likely find that punishment by the school is constitutional. See J.S. ex rel H.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District, 569 A.2d 638 (Pa. 2002) (punishment of student for publishing an image of decapitated teacher and soliciting donations for a hit man on his personal blog was justified under the "material disruption" test, even though it was intended as a joke and a law enforcement investigation concluded the student was not a threat).
Similarly, although your opinions are protected by the First Amendment, publishing defamatory content (See our Guide to learn what that is) — even jokingly — may get you in trouble at school, and maybe even get you sued. Other types of speech may also violate the law and put you within reach of the school's discipline, so read further to see what legal pitfalls you should avoid.
What Can I Do to Avoid Causing a "Material Disruption" at School with My Personal Blog?
Based on how the courts have applied the "material disruption" standard to off-campus web sites in the past, there are several things you can do to avoid a situation where the school might discipline you:
Most importantly, don't post anything that someone at school is likely to take as a direct physical threat against school staff or students.
Don't advocate for the immediate violation of any laws or school rules.
Review the Bloggers' Legal Guide to understand your rights and make sure you aren't publishing anything illegal. Just as you have First Amendment rights like other bloggers, you're also subject to all the same legal responsibilities.
Don't use any school resources to publish or view your blog.
Don't encourage other students to read or post comments to your blog while at school — tell them to wait until they are off campus. If you see comments on your blog posted by other students during school hours, consider deleting them.
Make sure it's clear to readers that the blog isn't sponsored by or affiliated with the school.
Before you start cussing or bagging on people, take a second to cool off. Although we think you have a right to use coarse language to describe people at school, and several courts have agreed with us, it will still increase the chance that your school will try to punish you
What if My School Orders Students to Stop Blogging About School?
Contact a lawyer; if you don't have one, contact EFF and we may be able to help. Such a blanket ban at a public school would undoubtedly violate your First Amendment rights, while such a ban at a private school may violate state laws protecting student speech that are described below.
LOLOLOL. Just an article on blogging rights. Not that i want to call up a lawyer though.
INNOCENT (lol got this dumb title from the random innocent guilty quiz thing)
Friday, October 15, 2010
SO. This post is completely hate free. I'm just rambling. ok? Things I've learnt this week: 1. never throw a shoe up a hdb flat with a overhanging roof 2. I must learn to pick locks 3. Never leave a wallet unattended, especially near black shirted drunk guys 4. SGK 2738 B 5. Never give someone their lunch 2hrs late or you will be plagued with guilt 6. Do not stalk fangyi look-alikes 7. The audi's lights on and off very quickly 8. Do not let Ernest near lamp 9. Amanda dances really well 10. Manish loves to scream and pretend to be a zombie 11. Do not talk about being shirtless or ppl will get the wrong impression 12. Tae Hoon makes a very scary pontianak 13. Ms Cheng finds falsettos hilarious Shall stop at unlucky 13 :D